- Resource Types
- Resource Languages
- Institutional Repository
Visit the home page
About Site Language
WHDL is viewable in multiple languages. Use the pull-down menu to select a language to view the site.
I changed my language, but I’m still seeing resources in the other languages?
If a resource or text has not been translated into your selected language, it will appear in the initially added language. We are always looking for help translating these resources. If you can help, contact us!
WHDL - 00021893
This project critically engages the classical doctrine of divine simplicity, interrogating its historical development and contemporary theological critiques to propose a “new neoclassicism” rooted in the concept of shaloming simplicity. By tracing the legacy of classical theism through Augustine, Aquinas, and modern interlocutors like David Bentley Hart and Paul Hinlicky, the study exposes tensions between divine freedom, determinism, and creaturely agency.
It challenges the perceived incompatibility of divine simplicity with a dynamic, relational God, arguing that deterministic frameworks risk collapsing divine and creaturely freedom. In dialogue with process theology’s rejection of classical metaphysics, the project synthesizes apophatic and cataphatic theology to reimagine divine simplicity as an expression of God’s triune love – a shaloming activity oriented toward cosmic reconciliation (shalom).
Drawing on Brueggemann’s vision of shalom and Eucharistic theology, the proposal reframes simplicity as God’s undivided commitment to healing fractured creation, with ecclesial implications for practices of community, justice, and sacramental participation. Ultimately, the dissertation argues that divine simplicity, reconceived as “love loving,” grounds a hermeneutic of shalom that bridges theological metaphysics and the church’s mission, offering a transformative vision of God’s economy for creation.
This resource is viewable by all users of the site, and is reproduced here with the permission of the author, who owns the copyright.
2025
2023
2022
2022
2022
2025
2022
1976
2024
2022
2025
2022
2022
2023
2023
2022
2022
2022
2003
2023
1952
2023
1953